Tag: lectures

If Mayors Ruled the World

I listened to the Long Now Foundation lecture from Benjamin Barber this afternoon. The lecture, titled “If Mayors Ruled the World,” is an interesting look at the growth and power of cities that I’d highly recommend listening to. I took a few scattered notes below. Enjoyed this a lot more than his book, Strong Democracy, that I read in college.

Around 40 minutes in there’s a section on global city growth that is fascinating. The stats he cites are mind-blowing, particular those around Chinese cities.

One of the main discussion points in the lecture is whether states or cities are more capable of governing on the global stage. Barber answers it by saying,

States cannot govern globally, that much is clear. Cities can and are.

As part of this cities must come to rely upon each other more directly as that’s the path to security and sustainability. To do this, though:

Cities cannot wait for states to figure out the meaning of interdependence.

In the Q&A he talks about Singapore’s subsidized home ownership process. It’s a pretty interesting idea that’s counter to how the US has approached affordable housing. In Singapore, the city basically subsidizes the construction and ownership of apartments instead of just their rental. What Barber describes this as doing is creating a wide group of stakeholders in the city’s future.

Toward the end of the Q&A Barber talks about why mayors don’t move on to more national government positions as frequently as one might expect. As he put it, “Ideology has very little to do with running a city.” Many mayors are more politically independent and, thus, don’t succeed as well on the national stage, where success is more determined by adherence to party line.

What really happened on Easter Island?

I headed down to Portland State last night for a talk titled “What (Really) Happened on Easter Island?” What follows are my notes from Terry Hunt’s talk about life on Easter Island and what caused the population to disappear.

Much of Hunt’s subject matter will be in his upcoming book, “The Statues that Walked,” as well as his contributions to “Questioning Collapse”, a series of essays questioning Jared Diamond’s ideas around cultural collapse. Popular ideas of the remote island society, 4,000 kilometers from Chile, that Europeans met in the 18th-century are based on evidence that Hunt says is outdated and often blatantly wrong.

Hunt disputes the idea that Easter Island’s society collapsed as a result of ancestors’ imprudence. He does not think they cut down an ancient forest and committed ecocide before first contact with Europeans, who came later in 1722.

Easter-IslandHunt says that the island had a disparate population who was resourceful and careful with their population management. He posited that building statues was perhaps a way to divert energy away from food production. This served as an indirect limit on population as a portion was devoted to building, transporting, and planning the statues. The layout of the island and placement of agricultural areas was not likely to have created a central village or a central chief on the tiny island.

The island’s lone forest, which is generally thought to have been cut down to provide the logs needed to move the Moai statues, was actually lost to a more natural disaster. The Polynesian settlement of the island introduced rats to a native population devoid of predators.

As Hunt said, “When you introduce rats to an island you introduce teeth for the first time.” This rat population, which could double every 47 days in the ideal conditions Easter provided, was more likely to have caused the deforestation. By eating the seeds of the native palm trees the rats would have destroyed the forest in a matter of years. Hunt referenced a similar phenomenon that occurred on the Hawaiian islands after settlement.

Ultimately Hunt believes Easter Island’s residents were far more careful with their environment than many believe. Their greatest achievement was creating a society that survived for 500 years on a barren island devoid of natural streams and only receive irregular rainfall.